MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 13:06
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 256
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 809
80% 652 Pts
64-Core 1,064
66% 1,064 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 151
Parallax 130
112% 140 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 140
Splatting 113
100% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 948 661 657 656 658 616 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,507
Write 2,326
Mixed 1,661
SusWrite 699
402% 1,798 MB/s
4K Read 65.1
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 89.8
300% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,121
DQ Write 957
DQ Mixed 1,049
784% 1,043 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 283%
Great: 340%
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
108GB free
Firmware: V8X01c45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 375 375 376 376 376 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 400
Write 361
Mixed 327
SusWrite 376
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 37.1
139% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 180
136% 178 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 99%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
349GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 97 94 95 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 136
Write 149
Mixed 69
SusWrite 98.2
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 75%
ASMT 2115 480GB
314GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 216 216 216 215 217 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 209
Mixed 191
SusWrite 216
280% 202 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 17.9
1,528% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 27.6
DQ Mixed 17.4
1,585% 19.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 157%
Great: 188%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 8GB
7GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 23.3
Write 6.2
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 6.3
12% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.7
178% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 23.4
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 27.7
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 16,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $669
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback