Lenovo 20240

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20240  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G505
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 11:52
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-2100 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Memory 24.8
1-Core 15.6
2-Core 30.6
15% 23.7 Pts
4-Core 29.8
8-Core 30.5
4% 30.1 Pts
64-Core 16.5
1% 16.5 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8210
Legend(17AA 3802) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 1.41
1% 1.71 fps
MRender 2.24
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2.3
2% 1.84 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 207 303 321 325 345 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 416
Write 339
Mixed 342
SusWrite 292
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 21.2
66% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 69.6
DQ Write 53.2
DQ Mixed 60
45% 60.9 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.83 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 5.2
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 287
14% 287 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20240 Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback