Acer Aspire TC-605

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-605
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 05:47
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 218
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 576
58% 473 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Emtec X150 240GB
44GB free
Firmware: BB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 429 428 381 35 399 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 352
Write 274
Mixed 356
SusWrite 350
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 41.6
153% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 207
178% 258 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
134GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 94 126 127 110 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 104
Write 98.2
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 103
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
47GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 41 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 38.8
Write 40.7
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 41.7
50% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.5% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-605 Builds (Compare 985 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback