Acer Aspire TC-605

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-605
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '20 at 05:43
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 194
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 558
58% 467 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1260 MHz, MLim: 1980 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39% Below average
Lighting 45.8
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 66.7
37% 57.1 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 47.3
Splatting 49.8
42% 52.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Emtec X150 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: BB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 235 234 238 236 236 MB/s
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.7% Very good
Read 231
Write 233
Mixed 214
SusWrite 235
52% 228 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 37.3
132% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 142
113% 156 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
77GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 116 116 123 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 143
Write 140
Mixed 119
SusWrite 116
96% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
1GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.6
Write 40.5
Mixed 24.4
44% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.2% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-605 Builds (Compare 985 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback