bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime48.1 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 02:41
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 152
57% 99 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 298
38% 288 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID K220Q
Nvidia(10DE 109D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 370.28
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 20.8
18% 22.8 fps
MRender 31.8
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 23.8
21% 25.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 129GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1467
Write 1,423
Mixed 1,391
319% 1427 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 37.3
126% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 244
186% 249 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 18.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.4
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback