Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 22 '20 at 22:48
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 167
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 318
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1230 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.7% Average
Lighting 51.2
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 66.6
42% 60.1 fps
MRender 61.4
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 51.4
44% 54.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 205 206 206 199 190 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.4% Average
Read 55.7
Write 196
Mixed 103
SusWrite 201
32% 139 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 21.7
76% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21
DQ Write 80.7
DQ Mixed 28.1
28% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 129%
HP S 700 1TB
306GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 246 246 247 93 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 337
Write 245
Mixed 240
SusWrite 180
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 8.3
37% 9.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 67%
HP S 700 500GB
382GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 250 248 249 53 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 332
Write 277
Mixed 282
SusWrite 183
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 18.6
66% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 57
61% 101 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 94%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 142
Write 18.6
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 16.4
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EVMT4G1600U86S Hynix DMT325U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5773SB0-CK0 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.9% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.2
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback