Lenovo MAU26MX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo MAU26MX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAU26MX
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150806
Uptime13.2 Days
Run DateSep 22 '20 at 20:29
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1005M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 51.3
2-Core 103
44% 72.6 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 101
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5011) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
1.58% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 1.62
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 3.17
2% 2.46 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.58%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 75 84 51 61 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 332
Write 350
Mixed 245
SusWrite 76.1
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 16.2
65% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 21.4
59% 125 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 71%
External USB3.0 256GB
50GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 201 210 171 164 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49% Average
Read 320
Write 197
Mixed 214
SusWrite 174
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 19.8
65% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 57.5
60% 98.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425S6CFR6A-PB Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.5% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 11.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAU26MX Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo MAU26MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback