Lenovo 20042

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20042  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Base Board Product Name
Memory1.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '20 at 18:13
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Memory 46.5
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 102
41% 69.9 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 128
18% 130 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3920) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2104
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.62
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 0.71
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$68
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB4Z
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 45 49 49 53 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 62.8
Write 50
Mixed 29
SusWrite 44.8
34% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
45% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3020EF48E8W1333 RMT3010EF48E7W1333 3GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20042 Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20042

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback