Asrock EP2C602

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock EP2C602  (all builds)
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '17 at 19:50
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2628L v2
CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 133
57% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 467
43% 360 Pts
64-Core 1,182
73% 1,182 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
XFX(1682 2990) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 12.9
12% 13 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 12.7
10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 167
Write 178
Mixed 765
84% 370 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 15.6
72% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 20.1
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 10.2
25% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 157%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
965GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 79.1
Write 80.5
Mixed 86.1
62% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.19
85% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 750GB (2008)-$72
697GB free
Firmware: 30.04G30 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 90.8
Write 86
Mixed 86.5
66% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.43
4K Mixed 0.43
122% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 52%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
230GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 53.4
Write 50.7
Mixed 50.9
39% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.11
53% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 63%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
182GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 65.6
Mixed 64.3
49% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.31
85% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 57%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
95GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 70.3
Write 71.2
Mixed 74
54% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.26
103% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 750GB (2008)-$72
83GB free
Firmware: 30.04G30 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 47.2
Write 48.8
Mixed 49.8
37% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.33
87% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.3% Above average
MC Read 24
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 18.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.6
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EP2C602 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock EP2C602

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback