Gigabyte GA-B150M-DS3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B150M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B150M-DS3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '17 at 15:09
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 191
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 302
40% 302 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Lighting 49.4
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 35.8
40% 42 fps
MRender 39.9
Gravity 43.3
Splatting 37.9
33% 40.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 256GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM08.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 486
Write 8.3
Mixed 11.8
35% 169 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 1.13
43% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 6.05
36% 82.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
140GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 67.9
Write 70
Mixed 67
51% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.3
82% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 57%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60
90GB free
Firmware: 3.AFM Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 67.1
Write 54.3
Mixed 60.2
46% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.13
54% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 42%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
154GB free
Firmware: 04.03B04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 92.7
Write 87.4
Mixed 87.2
67% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.32
92% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
11GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 107
Write 67.6
Mixed 66.7
60% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.36
106% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-041.A00G 9905625-062.A00G 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.7% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 16.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B150M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150M-DS3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback