bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200102
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 21 '20 at 16:28
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
CPU 0, 8 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 39.8
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 68.9
30% 49 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 584
48% 417 Pts
64-Core 1,244
77% 1,244 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 70%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 97GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 157 155 154 152 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 920
Write 815
Mixed 957
SusWrite 164
160% 714 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 17.3
62% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 422
298% 376 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 139%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 25.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 0.2
SC Mixed 2
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback