Medion E66015

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion E66015  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B460H6-EM
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '20 at 14:43
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$126
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 256
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 815
81% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,048
65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 0588) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.2% Poor
Lighting 6.67
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 79.8
5% 37.5 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 53.7
49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E12-512G-PHISON-SSD-B16-BB1 512GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1734 504 510 513 513 513 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1746
Write 2,050
Mixed 1,585
SusWrite 715
343% 1,524 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 82.5
294% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 992
DQ Write 811
DQ Mixed 895
672% 899 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 244%
Great: 233%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
262GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 463 466 466 403 403 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 433
Mixed 396
SusWrite 438
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 47
161% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 287
233% 331 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 113%
Great: 125%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
54GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 32 31 31 30 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 87.2
Write 59.6
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 30.9
65% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.7
127% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FN 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 23.1
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E66015 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Medion E66015

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $256
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback