Packard imedia S3220

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard imedia S3220  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard WMCP78M
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '20 at 10:36
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 215-$29
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Memory 54.3
1-Core 28.7
2-Core 41.1
29% 41.4 Pts
4-Core 49.2
8-Core 63.5
7% 56.3 Pts
64-Core 54.3
3% 54.3 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9200
Acer(1025 0228) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.95
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
0.5% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.63 fps
MRender 1.33
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.78
1% 0.84 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.5%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 39 59 49 59 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 51
Write 54
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 51.9
35% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 43%
HTS54101 0G9AT00 100GB
78GB free, PID 6830
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 23 27 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 23.9
Write 23.1
Mixed 17.1
SusWrite 25
30% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
45% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 15%
USB DISK Pro 16GB
14GB free, PID 4223
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 3.5 3.4 2.5 3.3 3.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Read 12.7
Write 1.7
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 2.9
5% 4.88 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 6GB
1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 6.4
17% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 5
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S3220 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback