Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateApr 06 '17 at 07:36
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 116
56% 88.7 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 270
30% 239 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 30.5
20% 29.4 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 34.3
23% 27 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 345
Write 230
Mixed 298
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 11.4
73% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 93.9
DQ Mixed 11.4
23% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 91%
Hitachi HTS541020G9SA00 20GB
13GB free
Firmware: MB1OC60J Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 28.1
Mixed 30.5
23% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 0.78
4K Mixed 0.2
51% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 20%
SAMSUNG HM160HC 160GB
26GB free, PID 110c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
9.88% Terrible
Read 27.9
Write 24.5
Mixed 25
33% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.04
4K Write 0.16
4K Mixed 0.04
7% 0.08 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.88%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0- Kingston KHX1866C10D3/ M378B5273DH0- Kingston KHX1866C10D3/ 16GB
667, 933, 667, 933 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.5% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.3
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970-GAMING Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback