Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory117.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '20 at 00:25
Run Duration525 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 174
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 679
61% 513 Pts
64-Core 2639
163% 2639 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$1,438
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 183
Parallax 167
131% 170 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 169
Splatting 126
112% 138 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 120%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$138
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,250
Write 2,046
Mixed 1,562
434% 1,953 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 61.2
198% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 600
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 541
395% 519 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Toshiba THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
66GB free
Firmware: 5KDA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 211 98 149 106 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 852
Write 462
Mixed 481
SusWrite 173
109% 492 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 44
152% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 714
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 431
351% 508 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 116%
Great: 170%
Samsung PM87 512GB
149GB free
Firmware: 3D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 239 236 234 219 216 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.8% Average
Read 267
Write 216
Mixed 182
SusWrite 228
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 16.3
61% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 126
100% 139 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 117%
Toshiba THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
61GB free
Firmware: 5KDA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 332 313 248 228 220 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,076
Write 629
Mixed 595
SusWrite 282
143% 646 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 52.9
170% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 687
DQ Write 438
DQ Mixed 283
286% 469 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 139%
Great: 170%
Toshiba THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
114GB free
Firmware: 5KDA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 219 253 197 196 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 891
Write 595
Mixed 516
SusWrite 249
125% 563 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 31.3
141% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 687
DQ Write 440
DQ Mixed 381
333% 503 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 118%
Great: 170%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
466GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 443 443 443 443 441 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 440
Mixed 397
SusWrite 442
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 39.6
129% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 82.6
80% 125 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
457GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 308 336 300 321 344 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 468
Write 444
Mixed 386
SusWrite 323
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 40.4
133% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 76.4
DQ Mixed 116
90% 127 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
466GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 312 323 291 348 332 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 472
Write 445
Mixed 399
SusWrite 321
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 41.2
135% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 71.5
74% 118 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87%
Great: 134%
Samsung PM87 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: 3D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 345 356 355 259 272 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 478
Write 423
Mixed 313
SusWrite 323
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 33.9
116% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 181
130% 163 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 117%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
466GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 358 300 289 301 370 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 471
Write 445
Mixed 400
SusWrite 321
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 41.5
135% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 89
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 176
120% 144 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
466GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 345 277 311 314 285 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 467
Write 441
Mixed 385
SusWrite 300
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 40.9
130% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 50.9
DQ Mixed 55.7
53% 86.8 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
379GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 441 439 439 438 439 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 464
Write 442
Mixed 374
SusWrite 440
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 39.8
129% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 52.4
DQ Mixed 119
77% 90.7 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 134%
LSI Logical Volume 6TB
649GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 217 222 219 219 223 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK 16x8GB
16 of 16 slots used
128GB RIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (92nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
139% Outstanding
MC Read 78.8
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 50.4
164% 57.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 17.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback