Lenovo 20287

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20287  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO VIUU4
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '17 at 15:40
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 182
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 460
49% 392 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 380A) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3272
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.97
Reflection 7.54
Parallax 5.78
4% 6.1 fps
MRender 9.19
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.7
5% 6.42 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.48%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 94.8
Write 93
Mixed 84.7
68% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.36
95% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8AK04G0110830 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.5
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20287 Builds (Compare 794 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20287

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback