Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 19 '20 at 08:19
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 133
2-Core 264
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 519
66% 502 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.24% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 10
Parallax 7.09
7% 8.53 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 8.77
Splatting 9.26
8% 9.66 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 7.24%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen08sm20ar256sdk 256GB 256GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0311A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 405 409 383 380 262 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 374
Mixed 375
SusWrite 374
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 33.9
154% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 51
101% 202 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
466GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 108 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 109
70% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4R4GL26A8R 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 12.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback