Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	69.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20160324
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '20 at 07:33
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 68.4 2-Core 132 58% 94.2 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 387 40% 321 Pts	64-Core 380 24% 380 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Gigabyte(1458 4012) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.08 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.5% Good	Lighting 84.1 Reflection 72.9 Parallax 61.4 68% 72.8 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 77.1 Splatting 75.4 71% 89.3 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 196 101 138 141 138 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 313 Write 313 Mixed 351 SusWrite 166 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 62.2 4K Mixed 29.2 103% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 15 53% 119 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 95%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 4TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 164 163 163 164 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Read 192 Write 165 Mixed 107 SusWrite 163 35% 157 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 11.4 4K Mixed 1.1 54% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1.5 DQ Write 12 DQ Mixed 1.3 3% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 32%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 58 57 58 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 80.8 Write 55 Mixed 46.7 SusWrite 56.4 44% 59.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 101%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1TB free Firmware: CC51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 136 139 136 135 138 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Read 159 Write 111 Mixed 86.7 SusWrite 135 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 96%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 639GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 106 126 155 119 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 73.8 Write 74.7 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 131 64% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 101%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 76.5 Write 68.2 Mixed 51.3 49% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 97%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$182 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 544GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 152 152 150 152 152 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 149 Write 158 Mixed 104 SusWrite 151 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 221% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 98%
Generic External 500GB 312 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 178GB free, PID 1340 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 29 Mixed 26 SusWrite 32.2 41% 30.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB 3,744 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 14.7 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 12.3 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	428x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	390x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	108x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	67x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	66x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	51x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	36x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	32x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	46x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	32x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $377

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16