Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 84.6 1-Core 68 2-Core 153 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 202 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 201 12% 201 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 04B0) 1.5GB Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.12% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.38 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 4.43 2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.12% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 449GB free (System drive) Firmware: GG2O Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 94 Write 62.7 Mixed 32.8 46% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G3S1339M.M16FKD 1x4GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	29% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.07 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 9.6 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1,267x
GeForce GT 525MNvidiaBench 2%, 9,032 samples	380x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	298x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	88x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 24%, 8,698 samples	68x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	51x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $228