Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1842 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '17 at 03:36
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 823
77% 641 Pts
64-Core 1,229
76% 1,229 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Lighting 47.4
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 39.1
39% 39.5 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 37.7
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 506
Write 431
Mixed 376
97% 438 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 24.7
108% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 62.8
77% 138 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 114%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 040B
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 172
Write 132
Mixed 113
104% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.16
4K Mixed 0.65
191% 1.94 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 88%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 104
Write 99.5
Mixed 97.8
76% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.24
89% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 173
Write 118
Mixed 118
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.16
96% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
487GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 147
Mixed 141
117% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.19
86% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 101%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 37.9
Mixed 35.8
48% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.21
76% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (82nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.8% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 26.4
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 24.3
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $1,059
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback