Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER C15B
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 18 '20 at 13:57
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4712MQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 185
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 315
32% 257 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Device(1B0A 2109) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 9.77
Parallax 6.81
3% 6.83 fps
MRender 8.43
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.87
5% 6.21 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 35 34 125 143 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48% Average
Read 443
Write 348
Mixed 325
SusWrite 112
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 12.5
65% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 81.5
DQ Mixed 28.2
40% 74.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48%
Great: 55%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
459GB free
Firmware: 1003YAM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 74 75 75 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 117
Write 106
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 74.7
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 55%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 1315 CT102464BF160B.C16 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 10.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 13.3
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback