Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121225
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 17 '20 at 00:19
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 95.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 224
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 720
71% 578 Pts
64-Core 852
53% 852 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 6684) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2550 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.4% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 121
Parallax 104
98% 115 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 137
Splatting 108
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 197 219 229 210 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.8% Good
Read 247
Write 72.5
Mixed 118
SusWrite 214
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 23.5
102% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 80.7
DQ Mixed 61
72% 129 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 89%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
872GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 967 1510 1520 1521 1520 1521 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 2,016
Write 2,027
Mixed 1,773
SusWrite 1,426
408% 1,811 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 63.7
208% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 788
DQ Write 414
DQ Mixed 282
295% 495 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 260%
Great: 347%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
806GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 133 132 133 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 126
Write 121
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 132
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 145 145 144 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 137
Write 132
Mixed 65
SusWrite 144
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
390GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 95 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 113
Write 110
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 95
71% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 88%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 148 153 153 152 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 110
Write 103
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 151
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 160 166 165 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 154
Mixed 84
SusWrite 163
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 36
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback