Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 16 '20 at 03:40
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 95.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 198
80% 135 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 528
53% 431 Pts
64-Core 655
41% 655 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 6684) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.9% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 115
Parallax 99.8
86% 107 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 128
Splatting 103
92% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 212 154 243 244 219 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.2% Good
Read 276
Write 67.5
Mixed 104
SusWrite 214
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 26.2
96% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 81.6
DQ Mixed 61.1
73% 133 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 89%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
872GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1237 1536 1520 1517 1517 1518 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 1,964
Write 2,057
Mixed 1,757
SusWrite 1474
408% 1,813 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 53.3
189% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 766
DQ Write 406
DQ Mixed 338
317% 503 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 253%
Great: 347%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
806GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 131 131 132 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 127
Write 116
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 131
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
66% Good
Read 127
Write 124
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 103
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
390GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 142 143 142 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 120
Write 114
Mixed 52
SusWrite 143
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 88%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 130 132 128 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 104
Write 109
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 130
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 160 164 166 165 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 156
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 163
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 34.2
108% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback