MSI Z97 GAMING 7 (MS-7916)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7916
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 7 (MS-7916)  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 16 '20 at 12:22
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 93.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 216
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 471
46% 375 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
MSI(1462 7916) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 15.2
9% 13 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 18.1
12% 14.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SS 500GB
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 231 199 197 270 266 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 285
Write 265
Mixed 287
SusWrite 231
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 40
136% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 40.4
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 39.6
41% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 115%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
53GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 115 123 116 118 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 327
Write 156
Mixed 194
SusWrite 120
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 38.6
139% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 32.8
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 42.1
40% 58.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 82%
Hitachi HUS724030ALA6400 3TB
312GB free
Firmware: MF8O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 107 108 108 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 120
Write 119
Mixed 61
SusWrite 105
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 93%
Hitachi HUS724030ALA6400 3TB
510GB free
Firmware: MF8O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 111 110 113 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 112
Write 118
Mixed 73
SusWrite 112
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 93%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
521GB free
Firmware: JKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 62 63 64 65 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 68
Mixed 38
SusWrite 63.8
43% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HUS724020ALA6400 2TB
201GB free
Firmware: MF6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 97 93 96 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 128
Write 129
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 94.9
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 77%
Seagate ST12000NM0007-2A1101 12TB
6TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 191 195 196 204 199 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965432-068.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
64.8% Good
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.5
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 GAMING 7 (MS-7916) Builds (Compare 1,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 7 (MS-7916) - $203

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $851
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback