Asus Z170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150906
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateSep 16 '20 at 10:44
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 279
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 798
80% 650 Pts
64-Core 777
48% 777 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.4% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 66.7
Parallax 59.2
52% 63.3 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 65
Splatting 68.3
56% 68.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 256GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1225L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 133 129 151 130 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 470
Write 284
Mixed 276
SusWrite 126
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 38.1
142% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 184
158% 230 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 95%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 1TB-$65
100GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 434 396 323 329 328 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 411
Write 430
Mixed 342
SusWrite 357
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 31.5
96% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 50.7
DQ Mixed 82.3
74% 117 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 104%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
301GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 69.8
Write 64.1
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 62.8
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
2TB free
Firmware: ML6OAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 75 79 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 76.8
Write 67.7
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 79
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 73%
Generic Mass-Storage 34GB
31GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
0.49% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.9
1% 0.65 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.49%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2263 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.5% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 24.5
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 25.3
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus Z170M-PLUS - $87

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $521
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback