| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| System | HP 2000 Notebook PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 188B |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130626 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 16 '20 at 06:32 |
| Run Duration | 169 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
|
29%
Poor
|
22% 26.4 Pts
|
2% 15.4 Pts
|
1% 14.8 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 7310
HP(103C 188B) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
|
0.88%
Terrible
|
1% 1.24 fps
|
1% 1.09 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1003YAM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 58 78 92 80 MB/s
|
36.8%
Below average
|
50% 68.4 MB/s
|
98% 0.6 MB/s
| |
|
Micron 4GB
4GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 14 16 16 14 MB/s
|
5.91%
Terrible
|
17% 12.5 MB/s
|
17% 0.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 4GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
7.65%
Terrible
|
6% 2.07 GB/s
|
5% 1.77 GB/s
|
29% 139 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 2000 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 624 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 2000 Notebook PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples | 126x |
| E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples | 83x |
| Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples | 47x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 206x |
| Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples | 91x |
| HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples | 82x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $98 |