Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '20 at 20:49
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 152
2-Core 303
95% 178 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 1143
103% 869 Pts
64-Core 2,112
131% 2,112 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 13AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 118
Parallax 121
101% 121 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 110
Splatting 96.4
99% 126 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
792GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 440 441 444 445 445 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 438
Mixed 406
SusWrite 442
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 45.1
153% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 185
139% 187 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 103%
Great: 121%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
582GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 441 441 444 445 445 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 437
Mixed 436
SusWrite 442
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 52.1
172% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 185
139% 187 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
7TB free
Firmware: RT17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 182 184 185 185 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 108
Write 167
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 182
89% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 0.9
297% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3000C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 37.7
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 36.6
82% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback