Toshiba Satellite S50t-B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemToshiba Satellite S50t-B  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141202
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateSep 13 '20 at 14:37
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 35%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 83
2-Core 142
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 244
33% 244 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F920) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
2.89% Terrible
Lighting 5.37
Reflection 7.62
Parallax 7.12
4% 6.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.89%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 422 417 422 413 420 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 423
Mixed 398
SusWrite 413
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 37.8
138% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 333
249% 330 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 100%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 17.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 19.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite S50t-B Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite S50t-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback