Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 18:40
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 194
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 450
50% 392 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D300
Apple(106B 012B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.30.01.53
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Lighting 30.4
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 36.8
25% 31.6 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 26.7
Splatting 32.3
23% 27.8 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 24%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256F 251GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM8JA1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,029
Write 645
Mixed 505
160% 726 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 38.5
134% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 479
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 231
204% 312 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4D33393342324737304442302D434D412020 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
96.1% Outstanding
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 37.9
108% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback