Gigabyte GA-H61M-DS2V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-DS2V  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 05:51
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2100 CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 128
62% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 204
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Sanyo(144D 809F) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.92% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 4.44
4% 4.26 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 7
5% 5.68 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.92%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 34 41 41 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 55.4
Write 55.8
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 36
34% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 42%
Samsung SP2004C 189GB
93GB free
Firmware: VM100-50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 48.2
Write 53.5
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 53.8
36% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4G1 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.9
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-DS2V Builds (Compare 329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-DS2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback