MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180124
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 11 '20 at 18:42
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 539
72% 536 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 192
Reflection 201
Parallax 187
157% 193 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 188
Splatting 132
121% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 640 321 323 317 317 316 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,450
Write 1,467
Mixed 1,274
SusWrite 372
307% 1,391 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 84.8
291% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 1,268
DQ Mixed 1,007
792% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 261%
Great: 280%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
104GB free
Firmware: CS900210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 213 223 225 224 225 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 462
Write 398
Mixed 312
SusWrite 232
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 27.4
131% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 154
148% 228 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 87%
Nvme PCIe SSD 512GB
188GB free
Firmware: 11.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 643 449 646 636 631 629 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 850
Write 786
Mixed 679
SusWrite 606
164% 730 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 46.2
173% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 887
DQ Write 595
DQ Mixed 829
595% 770 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 157%
Great: 242%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 178 187 187 175 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 112
Write 143
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 180
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 163 169 168 168 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 150
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 166
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 97%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
26GB free, PID b6b7
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 18.2
Write 19.2
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 19.6
26% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 3.8
258% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 27.6
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 26.5
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 2,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $887
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback