Asrock Q2900-ITX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Q2900-ITX  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280x1024x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 11 '20 at 14:57
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium J2900
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Memory 48.8
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 50.1
28% 41.2 Pts
4-Core 99.5
8-Core 100
13% 99.8 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0F31) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 1.03
1% 1.1 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.62 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 123 58 94 74 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 334
Write 209
Mixed 256
SusWrite 102
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 25.3
97% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 152
132% 195 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050H 500GB
75GB free
Firmware: ARF02A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 71 62 68 69 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF CT51264BF160BJ.T8 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.1% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 10.4
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q2900-ITX Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Q2900-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback