Asus Q551LN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus Q551LN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q551LN
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140626
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 10 '20 at 12:24
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Memory 41.3
1-Core 22.1
2-Core 36.6
23% 33.3 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 198
18% 153 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M
Asus(1043 16ED) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
8.14% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 8.81
Parallax 8.72
9% 9.34 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 8.35
7% 8.92 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.14%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 235 268 235 307 329 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 302
Write 306
Mixed 262
SusWrite 270
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 17.7
60% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 134
128% 195 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 134%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 104 102 102 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 95.4
Write 113
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 106
71% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
175% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA 1TB
694GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 68 69 65 67 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 16
Write 12
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 66.7
53% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.6% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15.7
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 6.1
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q551LN Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q551LN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback