Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '20 at 08:06
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$73
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 68.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 225
72% 133 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 432
58% 431 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 0588) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 88.4
54% 73 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 54.7
49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1043 953 968 970 981 975 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,879
Write 1828
Mixed 1,603
SusWrite 982
353% 1,573 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 53.3
174% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1046
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 498
396% 578 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 217%
Great: 297%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
359GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 161 160 161 161 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 186
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 160
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$82
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 165 165 167 167 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 161
Mixed 108
SusWrite 164
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FJ 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 30.5
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 25.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $624
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback