MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200807
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 10 '20 at 03:14
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Memory 89
1-Core 147
2-Core 303
97% 180 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 882
90% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,094
68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.22
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.3% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 112
Parallax 95.3
85% 104 fps
MRender 95.6
Gravity 97.3
Splatting 99.7
80% 97.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 628 324 323 324 323 321 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,873
Write 1,345
Mixed 646
SusWrite 374
234% 1,059 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 55.4
250% 97.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,132
DQ Write 1,122
DQ Mixed 1,018
795% 1,090 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 222%
Great: 236%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
47GB free
Firmware: S1Z4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 161 98 116 72 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 448
Write 372
Mixed 318
SusWrite 96.4
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 15.4
71% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 58.3
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 25.3
44% 82.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 100%
Amd-raid Array 4 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 228 232 215 233 223 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 267
Write 268
Mixed 119
SusWrite 225
160% 220 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1.4
362% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 141%
Great: 141%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71
645GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 180 173 159 179 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 133
Write 164
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 172
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 48.4
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 44.7
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 40.6
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 110%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $942
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback