Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191017
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '20 at 02:21
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Memory 91.3 1-Core 126 2-Core 253 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 496 8-Core 750 77% 623 Pts	64-Core 748 46% 748 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 86B9) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44.4% Average	Lighting 57.5 Reflection 54.9 Parallax 47.2 47% 53.2 fps	MRender 45.3 Gravity 49.7 Splatting 49.7 40% 48.2 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Shark 256GB NVMe M.2 256GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0614B0G Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1108 830 584 359 169 116 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	183% Outstanding	Read 1,379 Write 1,046 Mixed 858 SusWrite 528 212% 953 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 44.6 199% 76.8 MB/s	DQ Read 775 DQ Write 845 DQ Mixed 509 466% 710 MB/s
Poor: 121% ↑ This bench: 183% Great: 196%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 578GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 481 485 488 487 488 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 472 Mixed 424 SusWrite 483 106% 473 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 97.5 4K Mixed 58.7 192% 66.3 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 354 266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	84.6% Excellent	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 33.6 MC Mixed 23.3 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 24.2 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 2,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING - $105

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	542x
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	258x
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	258x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	218x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	149x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	106x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	90x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	85x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	45x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	128x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	72x
BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 82%, 12,603 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $581

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16