Gigabyte B365M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte B365M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateSep 08 '20 at 22:53
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 818
85% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,013
63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Dell(1028 3301) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.7% Very good
Lighting 95.8
Reflection 111
Parallax 103
78% 103 fps
MRender 94.7
Gravity 91.4
Splatting 95.6
77% 93.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 295 298 295 298 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 487
Mixed 454
SusWrite 308
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 56.7
191% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 115%
Great: 129%
SSD 480GB
190GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 449 120 93 207 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 146
Mixed 371
SusWrite 231
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 36.1
141% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 197
178% 270 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
381GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 144 145 146 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 137
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 145
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
268GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 152 149 151 152 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 191
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 150
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 113%
ST310005 24AS 1TB
344GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 38 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 35
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 37.3
46% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 19%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
9GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 22 22 24 23 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
40% Below average
Read 41.8
Write 24
Mixed 34
SusWrite 22.9
39% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 3.8
456% 6.43 MB/s
DQ Read 8
DQ Write 9.2
DQ Mixed 6.3
557% 7.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KY7N41-MIE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 22.2
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 24.7
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B365M DS3H Builds (Compare 9,191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B365M DS3H - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback