Gigabyte B365M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte B365M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '20 at 01:57
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 140
2-Core 246
91% 160 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 886
85% 699 Pts
64-Core 1,047
65% 1,047 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Dell(1028 3301) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2077 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.9% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 113
Parallax 107
83% 107 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 93.1
Splatting 100
79% 96.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 302 301 302 302 302 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 320
Mixed 297
SusWrite 304
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 38.1
145% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 246
211% 311 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 129%
SSD 480GB
302GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 452 165 100 100 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 450
Write 258
Mixed 350
SusWrite 223
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 35.8
144% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 196
178% 270 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
381GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 148 150 151 151 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 164
Mixed 85
SusWrite 150
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
269GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 151 153 152 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 198
Mixed 85
SusWrite 151
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
ST310005 24AS 1TB
344GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 35
Write 35.3
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 37.4
46% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18%
Great: 19%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
9GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 23 21 23 23 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 40.3
Write 23.8
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 22.9
39% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 3.9
453% 6.37 MB/s
DQ Read 7.9
DQ Write 8.9
DQ Mixed 6.1
540% 7.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KY7N41-MIE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 22.6
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 25.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B365M DS3H Builds (Compare 9,149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B365M DS3H - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $423
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback