HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory15.3 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateSep 08 '20 at 09:11
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 151
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 503
49% 402 Pts
64-Core 1,114
69% 1,114 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2072 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Lighting 72.1
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 66.5
59% 69.5 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 66.8
Splatting 70.3
57% 69.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 380 374 377 377 375 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 389
Write 375
Mixed 360
SusWrite 377
85% 375 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 25.9
81% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 277
218% 300 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 125%
Hds723030ala640 RSD HUA 3TB
349GB free
Firmware: MKAOA6C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 92 92 92 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 85.2
Write 88.7
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 90.9
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 85%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
142GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 103
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.3
232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST1500LM006 HN-M151RAD 1.5TB
554GB free
Firmware: 2BC10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 66 66 66 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 50.7
Mixed 49
SusWrite 65.7
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 67%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
347GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 28
Write 22.3
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 24.9
31% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 19.5
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback