HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory15.7 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateSep 08 '20 at 09:06
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 148
56% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 501
47% 393 Pts
64-Core 1,138
70% 1,138 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing below potential (97th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (68 fps cap detected)
55.6% Above average
Lighting 68.9
Reflection 67.1
Parallax 63.8
56% 66.6 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 67.1
55% 66.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 374 381 377 379 378 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 394
Write 373
Mixed 364
SusWrite 377
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 25.5
79% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 274
217% 300 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 125%
Hds723030ala640 RSD HUA 3TB
349GB free
Firmware: MKAOA6C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 92 92 92 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 86.5
Write 89.7
Mixed 48
SusWrite 90.9
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51%
Great: 85%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
142GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 107
Write 104
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 103
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.3
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST1500LM006 HN-M151RAD 1.5TB
554GB free
Firmware: 2BC10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 65 66 66 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 62.2
Write 49.7
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 65.6
41% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 67%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
347GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 23.7
Write 18.2
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 24.8
25% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 19.7
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback