HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory4.7 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110714
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 08 '20 at 00:19
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User TTO-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 159
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 210
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 18.2
15% 17.4 fps
MRender 16.5
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 20.1
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
690GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 111 113 118 116 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 126
Write 121
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 111
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 87%
Kingston DT 101 G2 16GB
15GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 2.4 2.1 2.5 2.9 3.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 7.5
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 2.8
12% 9.85 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.6
40% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 8%
HitachiG ST 500GB
465GB free, PID 1014
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 28.6
Write 19.2
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 23
30% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:02 FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.6% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 14.2
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback