Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	77.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130427
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 07 '20 at 20:49
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 110 2-Core 171 74% 123 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 529 54% 434 Pts	64-Core 529 33% 529 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% EVGA(3842 1068) CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Lighting 95.7 Reflection 88.9 Parallax 82.7 78% 89.1 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 81.9 Splatting 79.8 75% 94.5 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$81 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 136 128 137 135 136 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.3% Average	Read 218 Write 185 Mixed 153 SusWrite 133 39% 172 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 35 4K Mixed 21.8 80% 26.3 MB/s	DQ Read 25.8 DQ Write 57.9 DQ Mixed 24.2 24% 36 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 117%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 132GB free Firmware: 040H SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 137 128 137 136 137 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 347 Write 250 Mixed 223 SusWrite 134 53% 239 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 8.6 39% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 74%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 555GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 102 103 103 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Read 118 Write 106 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 102 129% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.3 166% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 63%
LaCie Hard Drive 500GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 435GB free, PID 1016 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 22.6 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 25.6 34% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 4x8GB 1,529 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	50.6% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.5 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 17.1 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 964 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $186Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	161x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	122x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	116x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	73x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	51x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	20x

RAM
Performance DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 77 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $214

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359