Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '20 at 20:14
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 518
58% 454 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Lighting 70.4
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 87.2
57% 75.5 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 57.7
54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 136 137 139 141 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 291
Write 250
Mixed 259
SusWrite 136
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 27.5
104% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 149
116% 160 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 116%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
55GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 137 137 138 140 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 332
Write 246
Mixed 222
SusWrite 139
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 19.8
76% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 58.9
70% 123 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
465GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 153 153 154 155 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 146
Write 148
Mixed 85
SusWrite 154
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 109%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
57GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 62 63 63 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 74.8
Write 81
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 61.8
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
62GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 120 120 121 125 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 94.5
Write 83.3
Mixed 55
SusWrite 122
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 69%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB
0GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18.2
Write 12.8
Mixed 14
18% 15 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3.1
196% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 16%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-00ERMA0 500GB
27GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 26 16 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.91% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 1.5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 21.4
13% 8.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 7.91%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68XP-UD3P Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback