Sony SVT112190X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 53% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSony SVT112190X  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131230
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMar 31 '17 at 07:53
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 53%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210Y
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
40.9% Average
Memory 60.6
1-Core 55.3
2-Core 83.1
42% 66.3 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 125
17% 125 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4200 (Mobile 0.85 GHz)
Sony(104D 90BB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
2.39% Terrible
Lighting 2.87
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 5.5
2% 4.4 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 1.37
Splatting 3.52
2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.39%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD256HAGM-00004 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT4300Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40% Average
Read 472
Write 177
Mixed 189
61% 279 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 6.62
32% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 22.1
DQ Mixed 6.55
8% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
36% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 14.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 10
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 36%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback