Lenovo 10SUS8DU00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10SUS8DU00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 312A
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '20 at 19:39
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 234
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 443
59% 443 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Legend(17AA 312A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7926
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
6.48% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 7.22
6% 8.23 fps
MRender 7.29
Gravity 6.17
Splatting 14.4
8% 9.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.48%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,960
Write 1,363
Mixed 992
317% 1,438 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 68.5
230% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1299
DQ Write 1136
DQ Mixed 1,077
846% 1,171 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
464GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 214 214 216 216 214 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 205
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 214
129% 177 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 121%
Great: 88%
Xtigo 8GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 0.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 12.9
10% 8.55 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.97%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 12.4
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback