Asus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics69.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '20 at 21:08
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 147
2-Core 241
93% 161 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 805
80% 653 Pts
64-Core 797
49% 797 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.5% Good
Lighting 87.9
Reflection 92.4
Parallax 81.2
72% 87.2 fps
MRender 87.9
Gravity 81.7
Splatting 73.3
66% 81 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1390 1353 1163 452 453 444 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,844
Write 1,465
Mixed 765
SusWrite 876
276% 1,237 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 61.3
232% 89.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,230
DQ Write 402
DQ Mixed 445
426% 693 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 235%
Great: 283%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
230GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 365 361 363 369 368 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 328
Write 350
Mixed 313
SusWrite 365
77% 339 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 48.8
162% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 219
163% 218 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 133%
Kingston HyperX 120GB
17GB free
Firmware: 503ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 128 130 129 141 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 360
Write 149
Mixed 190
SusWrite 132
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 38.2
145% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 126
106% 155 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 81%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 112 111 112 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 136
Write 107
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 112
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$31
324GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 91 91 89 91 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 107
Write 90
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 89.4
71% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3395 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 42.5
MC Mixed 35.4
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 47.7
SC Mixed 32.5
100% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 50
80% 50 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $934
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback