HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory0.8 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100804
Uptime14.3 Days
Run DateSep 04 '20 at 17:58
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 B24
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 76
1-Core 41.3
2-Core 79.7
44% 65.7 Pts
4-Core 75.8
8-Core 80.2
10% 78 Pts
64-Core 83.3
5% 83.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
HP(103C 3047) 368MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.54
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.76 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 1.39
1% 0.84 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 40 25 32 53 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 82.3
Write 76.5
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 46.9
48% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 59%
ASMedia ASM1153 500GB
384GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 8.2 8.2 8 8.2 8.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
7.31% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 11.2
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 8.1
17% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.31%
Great: 131%
ST350032 0NS 500GB
246GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.2 8.3 8 8.3 8.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.7% Very poor
Read 22
Write 21.5
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 8.2
23% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 14%
ST350032 0AS 500GB
414GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.3 8.3 8 8.3 8.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
8.53% Terrible
Read 22.2
Write 5.3
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 8.2
13% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.53%
Great: 17%
Generic External 500GB
330GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.2 8.1 8.1 8.2 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 21.3
Write 21
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 8.2
23% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 99U5471-052.A00LF ID:01 98 99U5471-052.A00LF 49GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.4% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.3
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback