Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140507
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 30 '17 at 02:16
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3970X-$250
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 692
67% 549 Pts
64-Core 830
51% 830 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63% Good
Lighting 79.6
Reflection 78.7
Parallax 68.5
65% 75.6 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 73
Splatting 72.7
60% 72.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
468GB free
Firmware: EXM0
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 321
Write 163
Mixed 231
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 15.2
73% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 42.1
DQ Mixed 14.4
16% 27 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 124%
M4-ct512 M 512GB
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 331
Write 162
Mixed 227
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 8.01
54% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 17.3
DQ Write 36.9
DQ Mixed 3.53
9% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 30.5
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $933
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback