bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory15.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory10.3 GB free of 15.7188 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200515
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 04 '20 at 16:23
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 14 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 56.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 255
77% 146 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 696
65% 543 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405)
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.16.7.5
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 18.9
10% 14.9 fps
MRender 19.2
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 22.4
16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 137GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 748 757 726 752 728 702 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB Virtual RAM VMW-2048MB Virtual RAM VMW-1024MB Virtual RAM VMW-512MB Virtual RAM VMW-128MB Virtual RAM VMW-64MB Virtual RAM VMW-32MB 15GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
8192, 4096, 2048, 1024, 512, 128, 64, 32 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 24.4
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 64%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,451 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback