User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemECT
MotherboardASRock Z97 Pro3
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150512
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 03 '20 at 13:45
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 614
64% 514 Pts
64-Core 651
40% 651 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 111
Parallax 95.1
86% 104 fps
MRender 97.2
Gravity 98.9
Splatting 100
81% 98.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 88 18 158 8.1 2.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 443
Write 374
Mixed 300
SusWrite 72.8
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 14.7
66% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 52.7
DQ Mixed 29.5
35% 62.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 17.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback